Philosophical conundrum ...

If there were a contest for losers ... how would you measure "success"?

I mean, if someone "lost" the most, then he (for lack of a unisexual pronoun) would be the "winner" ... which means he's not the "biggest loser".

And if someone "loses" the least, then he would be a "loser" ... which means he's actually the "winner"! But, but ... if he's the "winner" ... then he can't be the "loser"! Which means ... aarghmybrainisbleedingsendhelpsendhelllllllllllllllllll

Comments

[lady]

huh! u've had too much to drink!!!